扫二维码与项目经理沟通
我们在微信上24小时期待你的声音
解答本文疑问/技术咨询/运营咨询/技术建议/互联网交流
本篇内容介绍了“Kubernetes StatefulSet源码是什么”的有关知识,在实际案例的操作过程中,不少人都会遇到这样的困境,接下来就让小编带领大家学习一下如何处理这些情况吧!希望大家仔细阅读,能够学有所成!
成都创新互联专注为客户提供全方位的互联网综合服务,包含不限于网站设计制作、成都网站制作、昌江黎族网络推广、成都微信小程序、昌江黎族网络营销、昌江黎族企业策划、昌江黎族品牌公关、搜索引擎seo、人物专访、企业宣传片、企业代运营等,从售前售中售后,我们都将竭诚为您服务,您的肯定,是我们最大的嘉奖;成都创新互联为所有大学生创业者提供昌江黎族建站搭建服务,24小时服务热线:18980820575,官方网址:www.cdcxhl.com
下面是简单的StatefulSet Controller工作的内部结构图。
同其他Controller一样,StatefulSet Controller也是由ControllerManager初始化时负责启动。
// NewStatefulSetController creates a new statefulset controller. func NewStatefulSetController( podInformer coreinformers.PodInformer, setInformer appsinformers.StatefulSetInformer, pvcInformer coreinformers.PersistentVolumeClaimInformer, revInformer appsinformers.ControllerRevisionInformer, kubeClient clientset.Interface, ) *StatefulSetController { ... ssc := &StatefulSetController{ kubeClient: kubeClient, control: NewDefaultStatefulSetControl( NewRealStatefulPodControl( kubeClient, setInformer.Lister(), podInformer.Lister(), pvcInformer.Lister(), recorder), NewRealStatefulSetStatusUpdater(kubeClient, setInformer.Lister()), history.NewHistory(kubeClient, revInformer.Lister()), ), pvcListerSynced: pvcInformer.Informer().HasSynced, queue: workqueue.NewNamedRateLimitingQueue(workqueue.DefaultControllerRateLimiter(), "statefulset"), podControl: controller.RealPodControl{KubeClient: kubeClient, Recorder: recorder}, revListerSynced: revInformer.Informer().HasSynced, } podInformer.Informer().AddEventHandler(cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs{ // lookup the statefulset and enqueue AddFunc: ssc.addPod, // lookup current and old statefulset if labels changed UpdateFunc: ssc.updatePod, // lookup statefulset accounting for deletion tombstones DeleteFunc: ssc.deletePod, }) ssc.podLister = podInformer.Lister() ssc.podListerSynced = podInformer.Informer().HasSynced setInformer.Informer().AddEventHandlerWithResyncPeriod( cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs{ AddFunc: ssc.enqueueStatefulSet, UpdateFunc: func(old, cur interface{}) { oldPS := old.(*apps.StatefulSet) curPS := cur.(*apps.StatefulSet) if oldPS.Status.Replicas != curPS.Status.Replicas { glog.V(4).Infof("Observed updated replica count for StatefulSet: %v, %d->%d", curPS.Name, oldPS.Status.Replicas, curPS.Status.Replicas) } ssc.enqueueStatefulSet(cur) }, DeleteFunc: ssc.enqueueStatefulSet, }, statefulSetResyncPeriod, ) ssc.setLister = setInformer.Lister() ssc.setListerSynced = setInformer.Informer().HasSynced // TODO: Watch volumes return ssc }
很熟悉的代码风格,也是创建对应的eventBroadcaster,然后给对应的objectInformer注册对应的eventHandler:
StatefulSetController主要ListWatch Pod和StatefulSet对象;
Pod Informer注册了add/update/delete EventHandler,这三个EventHandler都会将Pod对应的StatefulSet加入到StatefulSet Queue中。
StatefulSet Informer同样注册了add/update/event EventHandler,也都会将StatefulSet加入到StatefulSet Queue中。
目前StatefulSetController还未感知PVC Informer的EventHandler,这里继续按照PVC Controller全部处理。在StatefulSet Controller创建和删除Pod时,会调用apiserver创建和删除对应的PVC。
RevisionController类似,在StatefulSet Controller Reconcile时会创建或者删除对应的Revision。
接下来,会进入StatefulSetController的worker(只有一个worker,也就是只一个go routine),worker会从StatefulSet Queue中pop out一个StatefulSet对象,然后执行sync进行Reconcile操作。
// sync syncs the given statefulset. func (ssc *StatefulSetController) sync(key string) error { startTime := time.Now() defer func() { glog.V(4).Infof("Finished syncing statefulset %q (%v)", key, time.Now().Sub(startTime)) }() namespace, name, err := cache.SplitMetaNamespaceKey(key) if err != nil { return err } set, err := ssc.setLister.StatefulSets(namespace).Get(name) if errors.IsNotFound(err) { glog.Infof("StatefulSet has been deleted %v", key) return nil } if err != nil { utilruntime.HandleError(fmt.Errorf("unable to retrieve StatefulSet %v from store: %v", key, err)) return err } selector, err := metav1.LabelSelectorAsSelector(set.Spec.Selector) if err != nil { utilruntime.HandleError(fmt.Errorf("error converting StatefulSet %v selector: %v", key, err)) // This is a non-transient error, so don't retry. return nil } if err := ssc.adoptOrphanRevisions(set); err != nil { return err } pods, err := ssc.getPodsForStatefulSet(set, selector) if err != nil { return err } return ssc.syncStatefulSet(set, pods) }
sync中根据setLabel匹配出所有revisions、然后检查这些revisions中是否有OwnerReference为空的,如果有,那说明存在Orphaned的Revisions。
注意:只要检查到有一个History Revision就会触发给所有的Resivions打上Patch:
{"metadata":{"ownerReferences":[{"apiVersion":"%s","kind":"%s","name":"%s","uid":"%s","controller":true,"blockOwnerDeletion":true}],"uid":"%s"}}
调用getPodsForStatefulSet获取这个StatefulSet应该管理的Pods。
获取该StatefulSet对应Namesapce下所有的Pods;
执行ClaimPods操作:检查set和pod的Label是否匹配上,如果Label不匹配,那么需要release这个Pod,然后检查pod的name和StatefulSet name的格式是否能匹配上。对于都匹配上的,并且ControllerRef UID也相同的,则不需要处理。
如果Selector和ControllerRef都匹配不上,则执行ReleasePod操作,给Pod打Patch: {“metadata":{"ownerReferences":[{"$patch":"delete","uid":"%s"}],"uid":"%s"}}
对于Label和name格式能匹配上的,但是controllerRef为空的Pods,就执行AdoptPod,给Pod打上Patch: {“metadata":{"ownerReferences":[{"apiVersion":"%s","kind":"%s","name":"%s","uid":"%s","controller":true,"blockOwnerDeletion":true}],"uid":"%s"}}
syncStatefulSet的实现只是调用UpdateStatefulSet。
func (ssc *defaultStatefulSetControl) UpdateStatefulSet(set *apps.StatefulSet, pods []*v1.Pod) error { // list all revisions and sort them revisions, err := ssc.ListRevisions(set) if err != nil { return err } history.SortControllerRevisions(revisions) // get the current, and update revisions currentRevision, updateRevision, collisionCount, err := ssc.getStatefulSetRevisions(set, revisions) if err != nil { return err } // perform the main update function and get the status status, err := ssc.updateStatefulSet(set, currentRevision, updateRevision, collisionCount, pods) if err != nil { return err } // update the set's status err = ssc.updateStatefulSetStatus(set, status) if err != nil { return err } glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s pod status replicas=%d ready=%d current=%d updated=%d", set.Namespace, set.Name, status.Replicas, status.ReadyReplicas, status.CurrentReplicas, status.UpdatedReplicas) glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s revisions current=%s update=%s", set.Namespace, set.Name, status.CurrentRevision, status.UpdateRevision) // maintain the set's revision history limit return ssc.truncateHistory(set, pods, revisions, currentRevision, updateRevision) }
UpdateStatefulSet主要流程为:
ListRevisions获取该StatefulSet的所有Revisions,并按照Revision从小到大进行排序。
getStatefulSetRevisions获取currentRevison和UpdateRevision。
只有当RollingUpdate策略时Partition不为0时,才会有部分Pods是updateRevision。
其他情况,所有Pods都得维持currentRevision。
updateStatefulSet是StatefulSet Controller的核心逻辑,负责创建、更新、删除Pods,使得声明式target得以维护:
使得target state始终有Spec.Replicas个Running And Ready的Pods。
如果更新策略是RollingUpdate,并且Partition为0,则保证所有Pods都对应Status.CurrentRevision。
如果更新策略是RollingUpdate,并且Partition不为0,则ordinal小于Partition的Pods保持Status.CurrentRevision,而ordinal大于等于Partition的Pods更新到Status.UpdateRevision。
如果更新策略是OnDelete,则只有删除Pods时才会触发对应Pods的更新,也就是说与Revisions不关联。
truncateHistory维护History Revision个数不超过.Spec.RevisionHistoryLimit
。
updateStatefulSet是整个StatefulSetController的核心。
func (ssc *defaultStatefulSetControl) updateStatefulSet( set *apps.StatefulSet, currentRevision *apps.ControllerRevision, updateRevision *apps.ControllerRevision, collisionCount int32, pods []*v1.Pod) (*apps.StatefulSetStatus, error) { // get the current and update revisions of the set. currentSet, err := ApplyRevision(set, currentRevision) if err != nil { return nil, err } updateSet, err := ApplyRevision(set, updateRevision) if err != nil { return nil, err } // set the generation, and revisions in the returned status status := apps.StatefulSetStatus{} status.ObservedGeneration = new(int64) *status.ObservedGeneration = set.Generation status.CurrentRevision = currentRevision.Name status.UpdateRevision = updateRevision.Name status.CollisionCount = new(int32) *status.CollisionCount = collisionCount replicaCount := int(*set.Spec.Replicas) // slice that will contain all Pods such that 0 <= getOrdinal(pod) < set.Spec.Replicas replicas := make([]*v1.Pod, replicaCount) // slice that will contain all Pods such that set.Spec.Replicas <= getOrdinal(pod) condemned := make([]*v1.Pod, 0, len(pods)) unhealthy := 0 firstUnhealthyOrdinal := math.MaxInt32 var firstUnhealthyPod *v1.Pod // First we partition pods into two lists valid replicas and condemned Pods for i := range pods { status.Replicas++ // count the number of running and ready replicas if isRunningAndReady(pods[i]) { status.ReadyReplicas++ } // count the number of current and update replicas if isCreated(pods[i]) && !isTerminating(pods[i]) { if getPodRevision(pods[i]) == currentRevision.Name { status.CurrentReplicas++ } else if getPodRevision(pods[i]) == updateRevision.Name { status.UpdatedReplicas++ } } if ord := getOrdinal(pods[i]); 0 <= ord && ord < replicaCount { // if the ordinal of the pod is within the range of the current number of replicas, // insert it at the indirection of its ordinal replicas[ord] = pods[i] } else if ord >= replicaCount { // if the ordinal is greater than the number of replicas add it to the condemned list condemned = append(condemned, pods[i]) } // If the ordinal could not be parsed (ord < 0), ignore the Pod. } // for any empty indices in the sequence [0,set.Spec.Replicas) create a new Pod at the correct revision for ord := 0; ord < replicaCount; ord++ { if replicas[ord] == nil { replicas[ord] = newVersionedStatefulSetPod( currentSet, updateSet, currentRevision.Name, updateRevision.Name, ord) } } // sort the condemned Pods by their ordinals sort.Sort(ascendingOrdinal(condemned)) // find the first unhealthy Pod for i := range replicas { if !isHealthy(replicas[i]) { unhealthy++ if ord := getOrdinal(replicas[i]); ord < firstUnhealthyOrdinal { firstUnhealthyOrdinal = ord firstUnhealthyPod = replicas[i] } } } for i := range condemned { if !isHealthy(condemned[i]) { unhealthy++ if ord := getOrdinal(condemned[i]); ord < firstUnhealthyOrdinal { firstUnhealthyOrdinal = ord firstUnhealthyPod = condemned[i] } } } if unhealthy > 0 { glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s has %d unhealthy Pods starting with %s", set.Namespace, set.Name, unhealthy, firstUnhealthyPod.Name) } // If the StatefulSet is being deleted, don't do anything other than updating // status. if set.DeletionTimestamp != nil { return &status, nil } monotonic := !allowsBurst(set) // Examine each replica with respect to its ordinal for i := range replicas { // delete and recreate failed pods if isFailed(replicas[i]) { glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s is recreating failed Pod %s", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[i].Name) if err := ssc.podControl.DeleteStatefulPod(set, replicas[i]); err != nil { return &status, err } if getPodRevision(replicas[i]) == currentRevision.Name { status.CurrentReplicas-- } else if getPodRevision(replicas[i]) == updateRevision.Name { status.UpdatedReplicas-- } status.Replicas-- replicas[i] = newVersionedStatefulSetPod( currentSet, updateSet, currentRevision.Name, updateRevision.Name, i) } // If we find a Pod that has not been created we create the Pod if !isCreated(replicas[i]) { if err := ssc.podControl.CreateStatefulPod(set, replicas[i]); err != nil { return &status, err } status.Replicas++ if getPodRevision(replicas[i]) == currentRevision.Name { status.CurrentReplicas++ } else if getPodRevision(replicas[i]) == updateRevision.Name { status.UpdatedReplicas++ } // if the set does not allow bursting, return immediately if monotonic { return &status, nil } // pod created, no more work possible for this round continue } // If we find a Pod that is currently terminating, we must wait until graceful deletion // completes before we continue to make progress. if isTerminating(replicas[i]) && monotonic { glog.V(4).Infof( "StatefulSet %s/%s is waiting for Pod %s to Terminate", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[i].Name) return &status, nil } // If we have a Pod that has been created but is not running and ready we can not make progress. // We must ensure that all for each Pod, when we create it, all of its predecessors, with respect to its // ordinal, are Running and Ready. if !isRunningAndReady(replicas[i]) && monotonic { glog.V(4).Infof( "StatefulSet %s/%s is waiting for Pod %s to be Running and Ready", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[i].Name) return &status, nil } // Enforce the StatefulSet invariants if identityMatches(set, replicas[i]) && storageMatches(set, replicas[i]) { continue } // Make a deep copy so we don't mutate the shared cache replica := replicas[i].DeepCopy() if err := ssc.podControl.UpdateStatefulPod(updateSet, replica); err != nil { return &status, err } } // At this point, all of the current Replicas are Running and Ready, we can consider termination. // We will wait for all predecessors to be Running and Ready prior to attempting a deletion. // We will terminate Pods in a monotonically decreasing order over [len(pods),set.Spec.Replicas). // Note that we do not resurrect Pods in this interval. Also not that scaling will take precedence over // updates. for target := len(condemned) - 1; target >= 0; target-- { // wait for terminating pods to expire if isTerminating(condemned[target]) { glog.V(4).Infof( "StatefulSet %s/%s is waiting for Pod %s to Terminate prior to scale down", set.Namespace, set.Name, condemned[target].Name) // block if we are in monotonic mode if monotonic { return &status, nil } continue } // if we are in monotonic mode and the condemned target is not the first unhealthy Pod block if !isRunningAndReady(condemned[target]) && monotonic && condemned[target] != firstUnhealthyPod { glog.V(4).Infof( "StatefulSet %s/%s is waiting for Pod %s to be Running and Ready prior to scale down", set.Namespace, set.Name, firstUnhealthyPod.Name) return &status, nil } glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s terminating Pod %s for scale dowm", set.Namespace, set.Name, condemned[target].Name) if err := ssc.podControl.DeleteStatefulPod(set, condemned[target]); err != nil { return &status, err } if getPodRevision(condemned[target]) == currentRevision.Name { status.CurrentReplicas-- } else if getPodRevision(condemned[target]) == updateRevision.Name { status.UpdatedReplicas-- } if monotonic { return &status, nil } } // for the OnDelete strategy we short circuit. Pods will be updated when they are manually deleted. if set.Spec.UpdateStrategy.Type == apps.OnDeleteStatefulSetStrategyType { return &status, nil } // we compute the minimum ordinal of the target sequence for a destructive update based on the strategy. updateMin := 0 if set.Spec.UpdateStrategy.RollingUpdate != nil { updateMin = int(*set.Spec.UpdateStrategy.RollingUpdate.Partition) } // we terminate the Pod with the largest ordinal that does not match the update revision. for target := len(replicas) - 1; target >= updateMin; target-- { // delete the Pod if it is not already terminating and does not match the update revision. if getPodRevision(replicas[target]) != updateRevision.Name && !isTerminating(replicas[target]) { glog.V(4).Infof("StatefulSet %s/%s terminating Pod %s for update", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[target].Name) err := ssc.podControl.DeleteStatefulPod(set, replicas[target]) status.CurrentReplicas-- return &status, err } // wait for unhealthy Pods on update if !isHealthy(replicas[target]) { glog.V(4).Infof( "StatefulSet %s/%s is waiting for Pod %s to update", set.Namespace, set.Name, replicas[target].Name) return &status, nil } } return &status, nil }
主要流程:
获取currentRevision和updateRevision对应的StatefulSet Object,并设置generation,currentRevision, updateRevision等信息到StatefulSet status。
将前面getPodsForStatefulSet获取到的pods分成两个slice:
valid replicas slice: : 0 <= getOrdinal(pod) < set.Spec.Replicas
condemned pods slice: set.Spec.Replicas <= getOrdinal(pod)
如果valid replicas中存在某些ordinal没有对应的Pod,则创建对应Revision的Pods Object,后面会检测到该Pod没有真实创建就会去创建对应的Pod实例:
如果更新策略是RollingUpdate且Partition为0或者ordinal < Partition,则使用currentRevision创建该Pod Object。
如果更新策略时RollingUpdate且Partition不为0且ordinal >= Partition,则使用updateRevision创建该Pod Object。
从valid repilcas和condemned pods两个slices中找出第一个unhealthy的Pod。(ordinal最小的unhealth pod)
healthy pods means:pods is running and ready, and not terminating.
对于正在删除(DeletionTimestamp非空)的StatefulSet,不做任何操作,直接返回当前status。
遍历valid replicas中pods,保证valid replicas中index在[0,spec.replicas)的pod都是Running And Ready的:
Pod is Running and Ready means:
pod.Status.Phase = Runnin,
pod.Status.Condition = Ready
如果检测到某个pod Failed (pod.Status.Phase = Failed), 则删除这个Pod,并重新new这个pod object(注意revisions匹配)
如果这个pod还没有recreate,则Create it。
如果ParallelPodManagement = "OrderedReady”,则直接返回当前status。否则ParallelPodManagement = "Parallel”,则循环检测下一个。
如果pod正在删除并且ParallelPodManagement = "OrderedReady”,则返回status结束。
如果pod不是RunningAndReady状态,并且ParallelPodManagement = "OrderedReady”,则返回status结束。
检测该pod与statefulset的identity和storage是否匹配,如果有一个不匹配,则调用apiserver Update Stateful Pod进行updateIdentity和updateStorage(并创建对应的PVC),返回status,结束。
遍历condemned replicas中pods,index由大到小的顺序,确保这些pods最终都被删除:
如果这个Pod正在删除(DeletionTimestamp),并且Pod Management是OrderedReady,则进行Block住,返回status,流程结束。
如果是OrderedReady策略,Pod不是处于Running and Ready状态,且该pod不是first unhealthy pod,则返回status,流程结束。
其他情况,则删除该statefulset pod。
根据该pod的controller-revision-hash Label获取Revision,如果等于currentRevision,则更新status.CurrentReplicas;如果等于updateRevision,则更新status.UpdatedReplicas;
如果是OrderedReady策略,则返回status,流程结束。
OnDelete更新策略:删除Pod才会触发更新这个ordinal的更新 如果UpdateStrategy Type是OnDelete, 意味着只有当对应的Pods被手动删除后,才会触发Recreate,因此直接返回status,流程结束。
RollingUpdate更新策略:(Partition不设置就相当于0,意味着全部pods进行滚动更新) 如果UpdateStrategy Type是RollingUpdate, 根据RollingUpdate中Partition
配置得到updateMin作为update replicas index区间最小值,遍历valid replicas,index从最大值到updateMin递减的顺序:
如果pod revision不是updateRevision,并且不是正在删除的,则删除这个pod,并更新status.CurrentReplicas,然后返回status,流程结束。
如果pod不是healthy的,那么将等待它变成healthy,因此这里就直接返回status,流程结束。
updateStatefulSet Reconcile中,会检查identity match的情况,具体包含哪些?
StatefulSetPodNameLabel = "statefulset.kubernetes.io/pod-name" // identityMatches returns true if pod has a valid identity and network identity for a member of set. func identityMatches(set *apps.StatefulSet, pod *v1.Pod) bool { parent, ordinal := getParentNameAndOrdinal(pod) return ordinal >= 0 && set.Name == parent && pod.Name == getPodName(set, ordinal) && pod.Namespace == set.Namespace && pod.Labels[apps.StatefulSetPodNameLabel] == pod.Name }
pod name和statefulset name内容匹配。
namespace匹配。
Pod的Label:statefulset.kubernetes.io/pod-name
与Pod name真实匹配。
updateStatefulSet Reconcile中,会检查Storage match的情况,具体怎么匹配的呢?
// storageMatches returns true if pod's Volumes cover the set of PersistentVolumeClaims func storageMatches(set *apps.StatefulSet, pod *v1.Pod) bool { ordinal := getOrdinal(pod) if ordinal < 0 { return false } volumes := make(map[string]v1.Volume, len(pod.Spec.Volumes)) for _, volume := range pod.Spec.Volumes { volumes[volume.Name] = volume } for _, claim := range set.Spec.VolumeClaimTemplates { volume, found := volumes[claim.Name] if !found || volume.VolumeSource.PersistentVolumeClaim == nil || volume.VolumeSource.PersistentVolumeClaim.ClaimName != getPersistentVolumeClaimName(set, &claim, ordinal) { return false } } return true }
基于上述分析,下面是一个相对完整的StatefulSetController的代码逻辑图。 (不支持大于2MB的图片,所以不太清晰,不过基本在前面内容都提到了。)
在上一篇博文浅析Kubernetes StatefulSet中遗留了一个问题:StatefulSet滚动更新时,如果某个Pod更新失败,会怎么办呢?
通过上面源码分析中滚动更新部分的分析,我们知道:
如果UpdateStrategy Type是RollingUpdate, 根据RollingUpdate中Partition
(Partition不设置就相当于0,意味着全部pods进行滚动更新)配置得到updateMin作为update replicas index区间最小值,遍历valid replicas,index从最大值到updateMin递减的顺序:
如果pod revision不是updateRevision,并且不是正在删除的,则删除这个pod,并更新status.CurrentReplicas,然后返回status,流程结束。
如果pod不是healthy的,那么将等待它变成healthy,因此这里就直接返回status,流程结束。
知道这一点后,就能回答这个问题了,答案很简单:
如果更新策略是RollingUpdate,则逐个滚动更新过程中,如果在更新某个ordinal replica时这个Pod一直无法达到Running and Ready状态,那么整个滚动更新流程将Block在这里。还没有更新的replicas将不会触发更新,已经更新成功的replicas就保持更新后的版本,并不存在什么自动回滚的机制。在下一次sync时,检测到这个Pod isFailed(pod.Status.Phase = Failed),会delete and recreate这个failed pod。
问题:podManagementPolicy: "Parallel"体现在什么时候呢?Scale的时候?RollingUpdate的时候?
在前面代码分析中updateStatefulSet中那段-"遍历valid replicas中pods,保证valid replicas中index在[0,spec.replicas)的pod都是Running And Ready的":如果发现某个ordinal replica应该创建但是还没被创建,则会触发create。如果podManagementPolicy设置为Parallel,则会继续delete then create
其他应该创建的replicas,而不会等待前面创建的replicas成为Running and Ready。
在前面代码分析中updateStatefulSet中那段-”遍历condemned replicas中pods,index由大到小的顺序,确保这些pods最终都被删除":podManagementPolicy设置为Parallel,如果发现某个ordinal replica正在删除,则继续删除其他应该删除的replicas,而不会等待之前删除的replica重建并成为Running and Ready状态。
因此Parallel体现在以下场景:
初始化部署StatefulSet时,并行create pods。
级联删除StatefulSet时,并行delete pods。
Scale up时,并行create pods。
Scale down时,并行delete pods。
而在滚动更新时,是不会受podManagementPolicy的配置影响的,都是按照逐个地、ordinal从大到小的的顺序,保证前者Running and Ready的原则,进行RollingUpdate。
“Kubernetes StatefulSet源码是什么”的内容就介绍到这里了,感谢大家的阅读。如果想了解更多行业相关的知识可以关注创新互联网站,小编将为大家输出更多高质量的实用文章!
我们在微信上24小时期待你的声音
解答本文疑问/技术咨询/运营咨询/技术建议/互联网交流